<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Random Hacks: Responses to "The Missing Future"</title>
    <link>http://www.readinglists2rss.com/articles/2003/06/27/missing-future-responses</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Technology and Other Fun Stuff</description>
    <item>
      <title>Responses to &amp;quot;The Missing Future&amp;quot;</title>
      <description>    &lt;p&gt;A week ago, I wrote an &lt;a href='/stories/2003/06/22/the-missing-future' title='The Missing Future'&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; about small, independent
    software vendors (ISVs), and their future role in the software
    industry.  My major questions: Will small ISVs be niche players, or
    will they have a major effect on the standards and technology we use?
    And do small ISVs offer any hope--individually or collectively--of
    challenging software monopolies?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.readinglists2rss.com/articles/2003/06/27/missing-future-responses"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:96374ed6-921d-4700-92c0-69a6db418e00</guid>
      <author>Eric</author>
      <link>http://www.readinglists2rss.com/articles/2003/06/27/missing-future-responses</link>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.readinglists2rss.com/articles/trackback/64</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
